This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dore, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Law's Literature, Law's Body: The Aversion to Linguistic Ambiguity in Law and Literature

English Department, Kent State University

In any kind of literary analysis, the critic must grapple with linguistic ambiguity, and the law cannot help but operate in a linguistic realm as well. Neither of these claims is terribly startling, yet studies of law and literature by literature scholars in particular remain strangely resistant to both. Literature scholars working in this field surprisingly tend to assert that the law grounds the ephemeral realm of the literary, and thus that the law corrects literature's linguistic quality. This unfortunate theoretical tendency is an effect of a broader problem in literary studies: an aversion to ambiguity that has seeped from studies of the novel into studies of law and literature.

Law, Culture and the Humanities, Vol. 2, No. 1, 17-28 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/1743872106lw034oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?