This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Skinner, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Stories of Pain and the Pursuit of Justice: Law, Violence, Experience and Jurisprudence

School of Law, University of Exeter, UK, s.j.skinner{at}exeter.ac.uk

Following Robert Cover's essay on law's "field of pain and death", Austin Sarat and Thomas Kearns have presented the bases for a "jurisprudence of violence," part of which requires including experiential accounts of (law's) violence in legal theory. This article explores these writers' understanding of violence, its relationships with law and the relevance of its experiential impact for jurisprudence, before focusing on two methodological issues. First, it argues that discussion of violence needs to be clearly situated and outlines a conceptual map as the basis for further analysis. Second, it questions the concept of experience in this context and addresses some key problems involved in articulating violent experience in textual discourse.

Key Words: law and violence • jurisprudence of violence • conceptual map of violence/mapping violence • experiential jurisprudence • theorising violence

Law, Culture and the Humanities, Vol. 5, No. 1, 131-155 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1743872108096866


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?